dmd.hashw

month

January 2011

34 posts

Jan 29, 20114 notes
Jan 29, 2011744 notes
“Egyptian Army Chief of Staff Sami Annan was huddling Saturday with five of his deputies after returning to Egypt from Washington, a senior Egyptian military official told CNN. Annan and other top officials were attending high-level talks with Pentagon officials when this week’s unrest broke out and those meetings were cut short Friday for the Egyptians to return to Cairo.” —

CNN

An official military stance might be coming soon. 

Jan 29, 2011-1 notes
#egypt #military
Jan 29, 2011183 notes
Jan 29, 20110 notes
#egypt #iraq #protest
Jan 29, 20111 note
#egypt #protest
Jan 28, 2011453 notes
I gotta say,

evilteabagger:

I’m really bummed with Fox’s reporting on Egypt.

Oh and by the way, Fox News.com > Fox News Channel. It’s not even a contest.

Al Jazeera English has much better coverage than all of the other Western news agencies in regards to this. 

Jan 28, 20117 notes
Jan 28, 2011136 notes
#egypt
Muslim Brotherhood Could Win in Egypt Protests, And Why Obama Shouldn't Worry | The Daily Beast → thedailybeast.com

The Muslim Brotherhood was the foundation of al-Qaeda and collaborated with the Nazis in WWII. It is regularly tied to violence against Coptics in Egypt and supports a single Islamic state in the Middle East ruled by Sharia law, etc.

Shouldn’t worry, yeah right. 

Jan 28, 20112 notes
#egypt #middle east #islam
Jan 27, 20111 note
#egypt #protest
Bloody and bruised: the journalist caught in Egypt unrest | The Guardian → guardian.co.uk

Along with nearby protesters I fled down the street before stopping at what appeared to be a safe distance. A few ordinarily dressed young men were running in my direction. Two came towards me and threw out punches, sending me to the ground. I was hauled back up by the scruff of the neck and dragged towards the advancing police lines.

My captors were burly and wore leather jackets – up close I could see they were amin dowla, plainclothes officers from Egypt’s notorious state security service. All attempts I made to tell them in Arabic and English that I was an international journalist were met with more punches and slaps; around me I could make out other isolated protesters receiving the same brutal treatment and choking from the teargas.

We were hustled towards a security office on the edge of the square. As I approached the doorway of the building other plainclothes security officers milling around took flying kicks and punches at me, pushing me to the floor on several occasions only to drag me back up and hit me again. I spotted a high-ranking uniformed officer, and shouted at him that I was a British journalist. He responded by walking over and punching me twice. “Fuck you and fuck Britain,” he yelled in Arabic.

Jan 27, 201137 notes
#egypt
Jan 25, 20116 notes
#analogies, #politics #state of the union #lulz
Jan 23, 201174 notes
#lego #hotel #outdoor
Jan 21, 20112 notes
Why Americans Think Obama is too Liberal → voices.washingtonpost.com

I think this stands as another reminder that the strategy of Senate Republicans during the past two years was politically brilliant. As you may recall, Mitch McConnell got a lot of attention last month because he frankly acknowledged that Republicans made a calculated decision to deny Obama bipartisan support for his proposals in service of a grand political objective:

“We worked very hard to keep our fingerprints off of these proposals,” McConnell says. “Because we thought — correctly, I think — that the only way the American people would know that a great debate was going on was if the measures were not bipartisan. When you hang the ‘bipartisan’ tag on something, the perception is that differences have been worked out, and there’s a broad agreement that that’s the way forward.”

Today’s Gallup poll, I think, reveals anew why this insight of McConnell’s was so crucial. What McConnell was really saying here is that if any Republicans signed on to Obama’s proposals, it risked suggesting to the American people that Obama’s governing approach was moderate or even somewhat centrist — something that could command some agreement. By contrast, when no Republicans signed on to Obama’s proposals it made it far easier for them to paint Obama’s agenda as ideologically off the rails to the left, which is exactly what they did.

If no Republicans were willing to sign on to Obama’s proposals, that had to indicate that something was seriously amiss and that there was cause for real alarm about the overreaching nature of his agenda, right? And judging by the outcome of the midterms, this strategy worked.

Jan 21, 201112 notes
Jan 19, 201114 notes
#f-22 #engineering #aviation #supersonic #aircraft
Play
Jan 19, 2011664 notes
Jan 17, 20110 notes
#gold medal park #minneapolis #mississippi #summer
“Provides that any person who owns a firearm in this State shall maintain a policy of liability insurance in the amount of at least $1,000,000 specifically covering any damages resulting from negligent or willful acts involving the use of such firearm while it is owned by such person. Provides that a person shall be deemed the owner of a firearm after the firearm is lost or stolen until such loss or theft is reported to the police department or sheriff of the jurisdiction in which the owner resides.” —

I’m not an American, so of course I generally try not to talk about the American notion of gun control. From an economist point of view, though, this proposal seems like a really reasonable way to create the right incentives for gun ownership, since it would encourage gun owners to do reasonable things to convince insurance companies that they were doing sensible things to reduce possible damages (like, say, taking safety courses, or not leaving a handgun in the glove compartment).

Do any Americans know how feasible this sort of legislation is?

(via jakke)

I’m not really sure what the point of said legislation would be. It is already illegal and/or required to do those two things you cited in many states. If someone is actually considering committing a crime with a firearm, I fail to see how an insurance requirement would change anything. Not to mention that a majority of gun crimes in the United States are committed with illegally obtained firearms. I would also point out vehicle insurance laws in the US. In a majority of states it is illegal to drive without vehicle insurance, yet many still drive without it for a variety of reasons.  

Instead of putting a burden on law-abiding gun owners we should focus instead on addressing the issues that cause gun violence and crime in general in the first place. Gun ownership doesn’t cause the violence (though it can make it easier), it is various societal and emotional issues. A man with psychological issues who chooses to kill his wife with a handgun will kill her with a knife. A teenager who lives in poverty that chooses to rob a corner store with a shotgun will rob it regardless.

Reevaluating our drug laws and welfare policies would improve the situation. 

Jan 17, 20119 notes
#gun laws #politics #welfare #guns #crime
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 19
  • February 23
  • March 11
  • April 8
  • May 3
  • June 7
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 6
  • February 13
  • March 9
  • April 8
  • May 21
  • June 11
  • July 19
  • August 4
  • September 2
  • October 8
  • November 8
  • December 25
2010 2011 2012
  • January 34
  • February 42
  • March 46
  • April 40
  • May 27
  • June 40
  • July 26
  • August 11
  • September 28
  • October 19
  • November 19
  • December 26
2009 2010 2011
  • January 87
  • February 46
  • March 61
  • April 62
  • May 61
  • June 93
  • July 93
  • August 73
  • September 45
  • October 33
  • November 42
  • December 36
2009 2010
  • January
  • February
  • March 1
  • April
  • May 71
  • June 20
  • July 74
  • August 42
  • September 26
  • October 41
  • November 42
  • December 41